Time Elapsed Since Ante Pavkovic Lied And Said He'd Debate Maestroh

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Worhty Boards Documentation

1) Posted 09 February 2005 - 10:42 PM

I have seen the Mary video, and of course Rome IS the Baylonian Harlot who has shed the blood of the martyrs and drunk with idolatry, and bent on global domination. Rome is pure evil.


2) Posted 02 February 2005 - 02:46 AM

I expect you to run away, after making sure you tell lies and slander me. You are the false teacher. All religious hypocrites are exactly what they falsely accuse others of being.

You cannot properly exegete this passage. It is clear you don't know how to exegete a passage. You simply superimpose you ideas onto a text. Hence you are guilty of wresting the Scriptures to your own destruction, just as Peter warned people like you, who trust in water rather than the blood of Christ.


3) Posted 29 January 2005 - 09:36 PM

Nonsense, we owe nothing to Rome there Foggy, except that they produced confused and embittered people like you who saw the evil and hypocrisy, and wrongly concluded Christianity must not be true, look at its adherents! You are looking at the wrong group--this one we were warned about in the Bible--Rev 17.

As for burning witches--you guys forget something. The pilgrim fathers founded a nation and made laws. They forbade witchcraft as well as kidnapping, stealing etc. If someone wanted to live in this new nation, its understood they had to obey the laws of the land. Witchcraft was against the law and a capital offense. To our pilgrim fathers, this behavior was an affront to God and would bring His displeasure upon the nation. If the witches didn't like it, they just could have left. Don't blame the pilgrims for following through with their laws.

The Catholic cult on the other hand, persecutes anyone who doesn't agree with her.


4) Fog:

The "church" said no such thing. The Roman Catholic Cult said those things, not real Christians. The BIBLE TOLD US 2700 years ago that the world was ROUND--A CIRCLE. So the poor persecuting dupes at the Vatican were wrong, that's all. Get your facts, or the lack thereof, straight.


5)Posted 29 January 2005 - 03:28 PM

Super Jew:

You forget that I have read church history, and I know what gnosticism is, and their dualistic tendencies, as well as the Manichean manifestation of those beliefs later on in history. When I called 1John "dualistic", i was doing so tongue-in-cheek. As with many errors, there are grains of truth in them, but they are taken out into left field. The Bible is a dualistic book per se. In 1John God is called "light, and in Him is no darkness at all". You find this kind of talk all over the Scriptures.

The dualism of gnosticism was that matter was inherently evil and that gnosis was all that mattered. What you did in the flesh was irrelevant.

I have tried to understand gnosticism many times. Like Calvinism for example. Even though I believe the whole system is unscriptural and blasphemous, there is a logic and consistency about it. Many wrong doctrines have at least that.

No comments:

Post a Comment